NTL Record

Title Atlanta Integrated Fare Collection Demonstration
Record ID 49168
Source 108p. in various pagings
Corporate Creator Charles River Associates, Inc.
Corporate
Contributor
John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.); United States. Department of Transportation. Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Office of Service and Management Demonstration; United States. Department of Transportation. Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Office of Technical Assistance; U.S. Department of Transportation. Research and Special Programs Administration. Transportation Systems Center
Publisher United States. Department of Transportation. Urban Mass Transportation Administration
Publication Date 19820901
Language English
Abstract This report describes the evaluation results of the Atlanta Integrated Fare Collection Demonstration. One of the main purposes of the demonstration, which was funded through the UMTA Service and Methods Demonstration Program, was to assess the extent to which an unlimited-use transit pass serves to act as a fare and transit integration instrument for transit users who make intramodal and/or intermodal transfers. In addition to the issue of transit integration, this evaluation also examines four other major aspects of the Atlanta demonstration project: 1) the socioeconomic and transit ridership characteristics of pass buyers; 2) the ridership and revenue consequences of a systemwide fare increase and the ability of a pass to minimize the impact of a fare increase; 3) the bus-rail integration enhancements of a barrier-free rail station; and 4) the trip generation and diversion effect of introducing rail transit service. With regard to integration, the demonstration revealed that providing a coordinated system of feeder bus service to rail stations has the largest impact on intermodal integration, followed by a much smaller but still positive effect due to a pass. Although small in absolute terms, the effect of a transit pass on bus-to-rail integration appears to be slightly larger than its effect on bus-to-bus integration. The majority of individuals who buy a pass do so in order to save money. While convenience is also an important factor, few individuals reportedly buy a pass strictly for convenience and make fewer than the breakeven number of transit trips. While far from being a primary reason for buying a pass, the response "easier to transfer," was considered by some to be an ancillary benefit of having a pass. The results of this demonstration should be interpreted with the knowledge that MARTA operates with a flat fare and a universal system of free transfers.
Rosap ID dot:10640
Rosap URL https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/10640
TRT Terms Demonstration projects; Fares; Fare collection; Pricing; Transfers; Discount fares; Public transit; Mode choice
Classification NTL - ECONOMICS AND FINANCE - ECONOMICS AND FINANCE;
NTL - ECONOMICS AND FINANCE - Transit Economics and Finance;
NTL - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - Transit Planning and Policy;
NTL - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - Transit Economics and Finances;
NTL - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Geographical
Coverage
Atlanta (Georgia)
TRIS Online
Accession No
00371561
Contract Number DOT-TSC-1757
Report Number UMTA-GA-06-0012-82-1; DOT-TSC-UMTA-82-35
Resource type Research Paper
URL https://ntlrepository.blob.core.windows.net/lib/49000/49100/49168/DOT-TSC-UMTA-82-35.pdf
Format PDF
Database NTL Digital Repository