| Title | An Evaluation of Intensive Supervision Programs for Serious DWI Offenders |
|---|---|
| Record ID | 51675 |
| Personal Name Creator |
Wiliszowski, C.; McKnight, S.; Tippetts, S.; Fell, J. |
| Corporate Creator | Bedford Research; Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation |
| Corporate Contributor |
United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; Association of Schools of Public Health (United States) |
| Publisher | United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration |
| Publication Date | 20110300 |
| Language | English |
| Abstract | Intensive Supervision Programs (ISPs) for offenders convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI) vary considerably around the United States. There are State “systems” that provide standard guidelines to counties and local communities in the State, and there are numerous local county and community programs that appear promising in reducing DWI recidivism. The authors prepared case studies for two State programs (Nebraska and Wisconsin), four individual area ISPs (“Staggered Sentencing for Multiple DWI Convicted Offenders” in Minnesota; “Serious Offender Program” in Nevada; “DWI Enforcement Program” in New York; and “DUII Intensive Supervision Program” (DISP) in Oregon) and two rural programs (“24/7 Sobriety Project” in South Dakota; and “DUI Supervised Probation Program” in Wyoming). These ISPs revealed certain common features: 1. Screening and assessment of offenders for the extent of their alcohol/substance abuse problem; 2. Close monitoring and supervision of the offenders; 3. Encouragement by officials to complete the program requirements successfully; 4. Jail for noncompliance. The authors evaluated three of the programs. The Minnesota Staggered Sentencing Program appeared to be successful in reducing offender recidivism, even given the small sample size of program offenders (n=200). Compared to a similar matched group of DWI offenders, the staggered sentencing offenders had a significant 30.6% lower recidivism rate (p=.017) up to 4 years post-offense. The program prevented an estimated 15 to 23 re-arrests for DWI due to its effectiveness. The Westchester County program appeared to be effective in the short term (18.1% lower recidivism in 5 years post-offense [p<.001]) but not in the long term (only 5.4% [p=.171] lower recidivism in 15 years post-offense). This program resulted in an estimated 78 fewer re-arrests for DWI in the first 5 years. The Oregon DISP intervention group had 54.1% lower recidivism up to 8 years post index offense than both of the stratified matched-sample comparison groups, adjusting for the demographic covariates (Wald=51.50; p>.001). The program prevented 67 re-arrests for DWI in the first 8 years. The benefit/cost of ISPs appears to be very good for the prevention of rearrests. Preventing re-arrest for DWI for multiple offenders saves thousands of dollars in sanctions (jail time) and rehabilitation. |
| Rosap ID | dot:40738 |
| Rosap URL | https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40738 |
| TRT Terms | Drunk drivers; Evaluation and assessment; Highway safety; Probation |
| General Subjects | Highways; Safety and Human Factors; I80: Accident Studies |
| Geographical Coverage |
Massachusetts; Maryland; United States |
| TRIS Online Accession No |
1359623 |
| Contract Number | DTNH22-05-25043, PR 06-01130 |
| Report Number | DOT HS 811 446 |
| Availability | NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Research |
| Resource type | Research Paper |
| URL | https://ntlrepository.blob.core.windows.net/lib/51000/51600/51675/811446.pdf |
| Format | |
| Database | NTL Digital Repository |