NTL Record

Title Information as a Source of Distraction
Record ID 61487
Personal Name
Creator
Inman, Vaughan W.; Bertola, Mary Anne; Philips, Brian H.
Corporate Creator Leidos
Corporate
Contributor
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology; United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center
Publisher United States. Federal Highway Administration
Publication Date 20151101
Language English
Abstract The overall goal of the Information as a Source of Distraction project was to further the scientific basis for decisions about the types of information that can be displayed within the right-of-way without adversely affecting drivers’ attention to their primary task—safe driving. There were two focus areas: electronic changeable message highway signs (CMS) and guide signs. Six studies were conducted. The first study examined the perceived similarity between messages on a full-color, full-matrix, light-emitting diode CMS display with 0.79-inch (20-mm) pixel pitch and the same messages on a liquid crystal display. The purpose of that study was to derive requirements for laboratory and driving simulation studies of CMS messaging. The second study examined the legibility distance for text message on the CMS display used in the first study. It was determined that, assuming 20/40 vision, legibility distance could be estimated using a letter height of 1 inch (2.54 cm) per 20 ft (6.1 m) of viewing distance. In the third study, drivers read the CMS display as they approached it on a closed course that required them to simultaneously navigate a curved path. The effects of CMS message properties such as flashing, phasing, abbreviations, and use of symbols versus text were examined. The fourth and fifth studies simulated overhead CMS messages on a freeway on which there was a CMS every 0.5 mi (0.8 km). By displaying highly salient images (faces on brightly colored backgrounds) that changed every 3 s, an attempt was made to distract drivers. Drivers did not look at the salient images more often or longer than they looked at travel-time messages. When headways were short, the salient signs had a 0.2 probability of receiving a brief look. None of the signs caused drivers to miss safety-critical messages encountered later in the drive. None of the signs caused drivers to fail to detect a roadway hazard (spilled logs). The final study examined the effects of the frequency and spacing of guide signs on navigation performance and eye-glance behavior. That study supported retaining current Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways standards and recommendations for guide signs and suggested further research on the design of specific service logo signs.
Rosap ID dot:35926
Rosap URL https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35926
TRT Terms Distraction; Drivers; Driving simulators; Eye movements; Guide signs; Legibility; Recommendations; Spacing; Variable message signs
General Subjects Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor; Distraction; Changeable message sign; CMS; Supplemental guide sign; Specific service sign; Sign frequency; Sign content
Geographical
Coverage
United States
TRIS Online
Accession No
1583597
Contract Number DTFH61-08-C-00006
Report Number FHWA-HRT-15-027
Availability Federal Highway Administration
Resource type Tech Report
URL https://ntlrepository.blob.core.windows.net/lib/61000/61400/61487/15027.pdf
Format PDF
Database NTL Digital Repository