NTL Record

Title East Coast Marine Highway Initiative M-95 Study
Record ID 74195
Personal Name
Creator
Garcia, Blair; Schectman, Jeff
Corporate Creator Parsons Brinckerhoff; A. Strauss-Wieder, Inc.
Corporate
Contributor
East Coast Marine Highway Initiative Awarding Authority; New Bedford Harbor Development Commission; Maryland Port Authority; New Jersey Department of Transportation; Canaveral Port Authority; I-95 Corridor Coalition; United States. Department of Transportation. Maritime Administration
Publisher Parsons Brinckerhoff
Publication Date 20131000
Language English
Abstract The East Coast Marine Highway Initiative partnership, led by the New Bedford Harbor Development Commission, sponsored a study to craft strategies for the development of financially viable Marine Highway services along the M-95 Marine Highway Corridor. Those services are intended to provide freight shippers with alternatives to truck and rail transportation. Operational, utilization, and cost parameters for nine potential East Coast Marine Highway services were developed for the study using cargo routing data from the Federal Highways Administration’s (FHWA) Freight Analysis Framework (FAF3). Based on the estimated average cost per load, four of the nine potential services were selected for further assessment of viability. Those services were: a short-haul loop linking New England and Mid-Atlantic ports, with a focus on New Bedford and Baltimore; two long-haul East Coast routes linking New York or Delaware River markets with Port Canaveral and Miami, FL; and a “pendulum” serving both short and long-haul markets, linking New England, Delaware River/Chesapeake Bay, and Southeast ports. Analysis of the profit and loss summaries created for each of the four service options found that the identified M-95 services face market, operational, and regulatory challenges to becoming financially self-sustaining. However, the study found that there are service characteristics that would increase the likelihood of a service becoming self-sustaining, including: 1) Encompass a wide geographic scope (e.g. East and Gulf Coast); 2) Transport heavier weight and/or hazardous cargos that garner higher rates for existing transport modes; 3) Provide service between a maximum of three ports; and, 4) Utilize right-sized vessels, such as a potential dual-use vessel.
Rosap ID dot:49122
Rosap URL https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/49122
ResearchHub ID 6769
TRT Terms Marine transportation; Waterways; Market assessment
General Subjects Research Hub
Geographical
Coverage
Maryland; New Jersey; Florida; Massachusetts; Georgia; New York; North Carolina; South Carolina; Virginia; Pennsylvania; Washington (District of Columbia); Delaware; Maine; Rhode Island
TRIS Online
Accession No
1739765
Resource type Tech Report
URL https://ntlrepository.blob.core.windows.net/lib/74000/74100/74195/ecmhi-m-95-study-final-report.pdf
Format PDF
Database NTL Digital Repository